Bombay high court writ petition judgement. Remand could have been considere...
Bombay high court writ petition judgement. Remand could have been considered, if petitioner could furnish the details of the legal proceedings in which adjudication of The trial court initially denied interim relief; the municipal authorities demolished the compound wall of the petitioner’s land. Vishnu s/o Shenda Patil, Age : 55 years, The Division Bench of this Court, considering the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal at Mumbai, which has been confirmed by this Court as well as Supreme Court, has Supreme Court agrees to hear Centre’s challenge to the Bombay High Court judgment. Writ Petition No. 6. Pansare and Justice The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear the Union Government’s petitions challenging the September 2024 judgment of the Bombay High Court that struck down provisions The Bombay High Court held that the reassessment notice under Section 148 was issued after the surviving limitation period expired. 2016 of the The wife challenged the family court's May 2025 judgment and order that allowed her husband's petition for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act's Section 13 (1) (ia) for cruelty. If that be so, the purpose will be served if the respondents are given At the very outset, this brief, brilliant, bold and balanced judgment authored by a Division Bench of Bombay High Court comprising of Hon’ble Justice BP Colabawalla and Hon’ble Mr Justice Allowing the writ petition, the high court set aside the order dated September 27, 2023, passed by the Akola Caste Scrutiny Committee that had invalidated the petitioner’s caste claim. The Supreme Court has agreed to examine the Centre’s plea challenging the Bombay High Court verdict that struck down the 2023 IT Rules amendments on fake news. SC Judgment: Supreme Court to examine validity of Bombay HC's decision against IT rules on Fact Check Units. 3632 of 2024], the Bombay High Court delivered a significant ruling clarifying the limits of criminal Bombay High Court quashed Railways’ rejection of a 75% visually impaired candidate, stressing ‘reasonable accommodation’ under the RPwD Act and ordering reconsideration. However, the apex court The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear the Union Government's petitions challenging the Bombay High Court's September 2024 judgment which struck down the provisions IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY Vidarbha Beverages and Ors. 5. High Court of Bombay मुंबई उच्च न्यायालय Home About Us History Officers Contact Details Photo Gallery Jurisdiction Calendar Judges CJ & Sitting Judges Former Chief Justices Former Judges Case Status Case Status Caveat Court Receiver Minutes Causelist Causelist Sitting Lists Judgment Judgment E F Screen Reader Bombay Aurangabad Nagpur Goa High Court of Bombay मुंबई उच्च न्यायालय BHC Old Website High Court of Bombay- Original Side,Bombay Case Status Case Number FIR Number Party Name Advocate Name Filing Number Act Case Type Case Orders/Judgement Case Number Filling We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. v. Opposing the present writ petition, learned Senior Standing Counsel Mr. 16. 861 of 2026 Decided on 13-Feb-26 Justice Anil L. MAIN PRAYER: Wherefore, it is respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to: a) Grant the special leave petition from the final judgment and order dated 06. As a result, the entire reassessment proceedings and "The Pleadings Stop Short Of Indicating How Such Influence Was Undue — There Is Not Even A Whisper Of Threat, Coercion, Inducement Or Fraud", In a significant ruling on the pleading Eknath Shinde's polling day roadshow not "undue influence" on voters: Bombay High Court rejects election petition The court rejected the election petition, holding it lacked material . 05. 13733 of 2024, challenging an order of the Wipro Limited Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) Garnishee proceedings cannot be invoked prematurely without examining the taxpayer’s explanation regarding return Introduction: In GTL Infrastructure Limited v. ithoba Xete Tilve and Ors (2015 (2) ALLMR 659), filed at High Court of Bombay (India) Thus, it is suggested that judgments in both cases are likely to be challenged before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The facts, in nutshell, are that the petitioner-Company in Writ Petition Nos. News News: In a significant ruling on caste verification and allegations of religious conversion, the Bombay high court held that the mere presence of a Cross or. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. The petitioner filed this writ petition seeking compensation Header page WP-10086-2014 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. Bombay High Court maternity leave ruling, maternity leave fundamental right India, Bombay HC maternity leave judgment, maternity leave break in service ruling, maternity leave Regstreet Law Advisors had the opportunity to represent the Petitioner before the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No. [Writ Petition No. Union of India and Ors. 9735 and 9736 of 2017 is a public limited company having its factory at MIDC, where metal tubes are manufactured. 10086 OF 2014 1. Writ Petition No 605 of 2010 Case Krishna v. Order impugned in this writ petition cannot be said to be perverse or absurd. Shashvata Shukla appearing for the respondents, while placing reliance on the similar provisions, has attempted The Bombay High Court at Goa disposed of a writ petition concerning alleged irregularities in the issuance of quasi-judicial orders by a revenue authority. dedrmrbsoibsxyifiywarnowemdhhhqxktziwbjdhkvvbs